Functionalist Perspective of Sociology


Functionalism is regarded as the core perspectives of sociology.  Sociology examines the contexts in which folks reside and how these contexts affect them.  In essence, sociology examines the query of why the planet is the method it is.  Functionalism, together with conflict theory and interactionism, is regarded as the main universities of sociological thought, examining society through a functional framework which stresses that everything, regardless how apparently unusual, from destination, or dangerous, serves a purpose.

The functionalist perspective evolved within the work of Emile Durkheim, though it was shaped by Harvard sociologist Talcott Parsons during the mid-20th Century.  According to Bohm, functionalism is summed up with 1 easy premise: “the planet is a program of interrelated components, and each piece makes a required contribution to the energy of the program.”

Functionalism holds that everyone and everything in society, regardless how unusual it will appear, serves a purpose.  Crime, for illustration, is viewed virtually universally as a nuisance.  Functionalists, nevertheless, point out that crime serves many reasons.  Crime creates the need for the work of authorities officers, criminal investigators, prosecutors, protection attorneys, lawmakers and different associated fields of work.  If crime were to suddenly disappear within the world, hundreds of thousands of jobs associated to the existence of crime would no longer be required and everyone in those positions would face unemployment.  It is equally recommended that the existence of crime is functional in its ability to rally families and communities together around a popular purpose.

Durkheim concluded that crime and deviance serve 3 main functions for society: deviance clarifies or reaffirms societal norms, it promotes social unity, and it challenges the status quo.  Deviance will bring into query the status quo, forcing society to rethink earlier held norms.  For instance, acts considered criminal or deviant were important in shaping the rights movements for African Americans, ladies, and homosexuals in the United States.  Without questioning the conventional means of treating disadvantaged groups, the norms of discrimination and prejudice couldn’t be broken.

Criticisms of functionalism focus on its acceptance and rationalization of social inequality and societal evils.  Since functionalism holds that all aspects of society are required, human rights issues like poverty, hunger, slavery, and genocide need to be accounted for.  Critics recommend that functionalism is employed as a rationalization of such issues.  The perspective is equally criticized for its deficiency of testability, that is important for upholding any social research theory.  Several concerns stand against its dependability.

Functionalism might be described as the many general and ineffective of the sociological universities.  It is not logically in sync with variability between cultures and it cannot effectively explain change.  However, it has its strong points, like its ability to explain crime and deviance.  Functionalism really serves as the many conservative of the sociological universities of thought.

  • CommentLuv badge


    This blog uses CommentLuv technology. It allows you to put your keywords with your name. To complete this, you need approved at least one comment. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 3)